At this stage, it was ruled that HDP's request for an injunction to block the bank account holding treasury grants was rejected.
The statement made by the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office stated, "The HDP terrorist organization is the political wing of the PKK. Some participation in the terrorist organization was organized by HDP. Party buildings were turned into organizational cells. Not criticizing the PKK invalidates its political claim."
In March, a lawsuit was filed by the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation against the HDP, which has been on the agenda for a while. The indictment requesting the closure of HDP, which was returned by the High Court for the completion of deficiencies, was re-prepared by the Chief Public Prosecutor's Office of the Supreme Court and sent to the Constitutional Court.
How will the process work?
After that, the indictment will be sent to HDP for preliminary defense. HDP has to give its preliminary defense within the time allowed by the Supreme Court. However, the party can apply for an extension of this period.
The Constitutional Court committee consisting of 15 people will decide the closure case against the HDP. The closure of the party due to the situations listed in the articles of the Constitution or the partial or complete deprivation of state aid depending on the gravity of the acts subject to the case; it will be possible to decide with a 2/3 majority of the members of the court attending the meeting, that is, with the votes of 10 of the 15 members.